For thousands of years, people have sought out warmth for reasons that had little to do with performance or productivity. They stepped into heated rooms to recover after long days of physical work, to quiet busy minds, to gather with the people they loved, and simply to pause.
Long before wellness became an industry, heat was already woven into ordinary life. Finnish smoke saunas, Japanese bathhouses, Roman thermae, and Indigenous sweat lodges belonged to different cultures and different centuries, yet they shared a remarkably similar purpose: making space for restoration.
The settings have changed. The ritual hasn't. We still look for the moments that slow our breathing, loosen the day's tension, and hand us back to ourselves.
Today's infrared sauna is a modern evolution of that tradition. Rather than heating the surrounding air to extreme temperatures, infrared technology uses wavelengths of light to warm the body directly — an experience many people find gentler, while still calling on the body's natural response to heat.
As infrared saunas have become more common in homes, research into their effects has grown alongside them. Scientists have studied everything from cardiovascular function and exercise recovery to sleep, circulation, and chronic pain. Some of those questions now have real answers. Others remain genuinely open.
Understanding the difference matters — and it's the reason we wrote this.
At Aureline Wellness, we don't think wellness should be built on exaggerated claims. So rather than hand you a list of benefits, this guide walks through what the peer-reviewed research actually suggests: where the evidence is strongest, where it's still emerging, and where it simply isn't there yet. Every study we reference is linked to its listing on PubMed, the U.S. National Library of Medicine's index of biomedical literature, so you can read the source yourself.
Research Snapshot
Current research suggests infrared sauna use may support several aspects of health — but the strength of the evidence varies a great deal depending on which outcome you're asking about.
| Area studied | Current evidence | What that means |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiovascular function | Strongest | Meta-analysis and randomised trial evidence, mostly in heart failure patients under medical supervision |
| Blood vessel function | Moderate | Measured improvements in endothelial function, though studies are small |
| Exercise recovery | Moderate | The best directly infrared evidence in healthy people; effects are real but modest |
| Blood pressure | Moderate, short-term | Reliable drop after a session; lasting effect not yet established |
| Relaxation & stress | Moderate | Largely self-reported, and hard to separate heat from the act of resting |
| Chronic pain | Early | Encouraging small studies; may offer symptom relief, not a treatment |
| Sleep | Not demonstrated | No infrared sauna trial has shown improved sleep |
The rest of this article explains how each of those ratings was arrived at.
What an Infrared Sauna Actually Is
A traditional Finnish sauna heats the air around you, typically to 70–100°C, and your body warms because the room is hot. A far-infrared sauna works differently: infrared emitters radiate energy that is absorbed directly by your skin, so the cabin itself can stay far cooler — usually somewhere around 45–60°C. That's the practical appeal. It feels less punishing, most people can stay in longer, and it's easier to turn into a habit.
Far-infrared radiation and its medical applications were reviewed by Vatansever and Hamblin in Photonics & Lasers in Medicine in 2012 (PubMed). Much of the clinical literature you'll encounter uses a specific Japanese protocol called Waon therapy — a far-infrared dry sauna held at 60°C for 15 minutes, followed by 30 minutes of rest wrapped in a blanket. Keep that protocol in mind, because nearly every impressive cardiac result below comes from it, and it looks quite different from sitting in a home cabin for 40 minutes scrolling your phone.
The "Deep Penetration" Claim Deserves Scrutiny
You will see it everywhere, including in older research papers: infrared heat penetrates 3–4 cm into tissue. It's the single most repeated infrared sauna claim, and in 2025 a team at the University of Oregon finally measured it directly.
Writing in the Journal of Applied Physiology, Reed and colleagues inserted a multisensor temperature probe into the quadriceps of ten adults and sat them in a commercially available far-infrared sauna for 45 minutes (PubMed). Muscle temperature did rise — but it fell off sharply with depth:
- 1.4 cm below the skin: +3.0°C
- 2.4 cm below the skin: +1.9°C
- 3.4 cm below the skin: +1.1°C
The authors found the thermal effect had diminished by 63% at 2.4 cm and was negligible beyond roughly 3.8 cm, concluding that commercially available infrared saunas "provide only superficial heating of peripheral tissues." Notably, core temperature didn't change at all (0.0°C), while mean skin temperature rose 6.2°C. Participants sweated at 0.46 L/h and lost about 0.48% of their body weight.
This is worth sitting with. It doesn't mean infrared saunas don't work — the same study confirms they meaningfully warm muscle tissue. It suggests the mechanism is skin-and-surface heating rather than some deep-tissue penetration other forms of heat can't reach. Any weight lost in a session is water, and you should drink it back.
What the Famous Finnish Studies Show — and Why They're Not About Infrared
If you've read anything about saunas and health, you've met these numbers. They deserve a place here, and they deserve an honest frame, because they are simultaneously the most impressive sauna research in existence and the most frequently misused.
The Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease study has followed thousands of middle-aged Finnish men for decades. Its sauna findings, published in major journals, are striking. Comparing men who took 4–7 sauna sessions per week against those taking just one:
- Sudden cardiac death. Laukkanen and colleagues, JAMA Internal Medicine, 2015 — 2,315 men followed a median of 20.7 years. Hazard ratio 0.37 (95% CI 0.18–0.75). All-cause mortality occurred in 30.8% of the most frequent bathers versus 49.1% of the once-a-week group (PubMed).
- Stroke. Kunutsor and colleagues, Neurology, 2018 — 1,628 men and women, median 14.9 years. Hazard ratio 0.39 (95% CI 0.18–0.84) after adjustment (PubMed).
- Hypertension. Zaccardi and colleagues, American Journal of Hypertension, 2017 — 1,621 men, median 24.7 years. Hazard ratio 0.54 (95% CI 0.32–0.91) for developing high blood pressure (PubMed).
- Dementia. Laukkanen and colleagues, Age and Ageing, 2017 — hazard ratio 0.34 (95% CI 0.16–0.71) for dementia, 0.35 (95% CI 0.14–0.90) for Alzheimer's disease (PubMed).
Harvard Health Publishing covered the JAMA Internal Medicine findings directly, noting that the Finnish researchers suggest saunas may offer some cardiovascular conditioning because high temperatures can push heart rates toward those reached in moderate-intensity exercise (Harvard Health).
Now the two caveats that most articles quietly omit.
First: these studies are about traditional Finnish saunas, not infrared ones. The temperatures, the mechanism, and the cardiovascular load are all different. It would be convenient for us to present this data as though it were about the products on this page. It isn't, and we won't.
Second: these are observational studies. They show an association, not causation. Men who sauna four to seven times a week may simply be healthier, wealthier, less isolated, or more able to exercise than men who manage it once. The researchers adjusted for many such factors, but adjustment is not the same as proof. The authors themselves call for further study to establish a mechanism.
Read honestly, this is still a remarkable body of evidence, and it's the main reason heat therapy is taken seriously by cardiologists at all. It just isn't a claim about an infrared cabin.
Heart and Circulation: The Strongest Infrared Evidence
This is where research specific to infrared saunas is most developed — with an important caveat: most of it studies patients with heart failure under medical supervision, not healthy people at home.
A 2018 systematic review and meta-analysis in Clinical Cardiology by Källström and colleagues screened 1,444 studies and included nine (PubMed). Strikingly, only infrared sauna studies met their inclusion criteria — the traditional-sauna trial evidence wasn't strong enough to qualify. Pooling the data on the 60°C/15-minute protocol done five times a week for two to four weeks, they found significant reductions in B-type natriuretic peptide (a blood marker of cardiac strain) and cardiothoracic ratio, plus improved left-ventricular ejection fraction.
But the same analysis found no significant effect on systolic or diastolic blood pressure, and rated its own strength of evidence as ranging from "moderate to insufficient." That's the authors' assessment, not ours.
The largest single trial is WAON-CHF, published by Tei and colleagues in Circulation Journal in 2016 (PubMed). Across 19 institutes, 149 patients with advanced heart failure were randomised to Waon therapy or control. Symptom class, six-minute walk distance, and cardiothoracic ratio all improved significantly in the sauna group — but the study's primary endpoint, the change in BNP, did not reach statistical significance. No serious adverse events occurred in either group. A trial that misses its primary endpoint while hitting several secondary ones is encouraging, not conclusive, and it deserves to be described that way.
Blood Vessels: A Clean, Specific Finding
One of the most elegant studies in this field is now over twenty years old. Imamura and colleagues, publishing in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology in 2001, took 25 men with at least one coronary risk factor and gave them two weeks of daily 60°C infrared sauna sessions (PubMed).
They measured flow-mediated dilation — how well an artery widens in response to increased blood flow, a standard test of the endothelium, the inner lining of your blood vessels. It improved from 4.0% to 5.8% (p < 0.001). Crucially, they also measured the artery's response to nitroglycerin, which dilates vessels without involving the endothelium — and that didn't change at all. The heat appeared to be acting specifically on endothelial function rather than just relaxing the vessel generally.
Zooming out, a 2021 systematic review and meta-analysis in Experimental Physiology by Pizzey and colleagues pooled 15 studies of heat therapy broadly — saunas, hot water immersion, and similar (PubMed). Compared with controls, heat therapy reduced mean arterial pressure by 5.86 mmHg, systolic pressure by 3.94 mmHg, and diastolic pressure by 3.88 mmHg, and improved flow-mediated dilation by 1.95%. Resting heart rate was unchanged. The certainty of evidence was rated moderate for blood pressure and low for flow-mediated dilation.
Note the tension with the heart-failure meta-analysis above, which found no blood-pressure effect. Different populations, different modalities, different answers. That disagreement is the current state of the science.
Blood Pressure: Real, but Mostly Short-Lived
Heat makes blood vessels dilate, and blood pressure drops. That much is not controversial. The open question is whether it lasts.
Kominami and colleagues tracked 370 Waon therapy sessions in 31 patients with hypertension for a 2021 paper in Medicine (PubMed). A single session reliably lowered both systolic and diastolic pressure. Across repeated sessions, though, the reduction wasn't statistically significant for the group as a whole — it reached significance only in the non-smoking subgroup, where systolic pressure fell from 124.2 to 108.8 mmHg. That's a striking number from a small, uncontrolled subgroup, and it should be read with real caution.
A 2026 narrative review in Complementary Therapies in Medicine by Yamasaki and colleagues put it plainly (PubMed): across heat modalities, systolic reductions of roughly 11–27 mmHg were reported within 24 hours, but most studies lacked control groups, and "the long-term antihypertensive efficacy of heat therapy is unproven." The same review flagged that safety margins for frail older adults and people taking beta-blockers remain insufficiently defined.
If you have hypertension, an infrared sauna is not a substitute for treatment. Talk to your physician — particularly about medication interactions.
Exercise Recovery: The Best Direct Infrared Evidence

Here the research is actually about infrared saunas and healthy people, which makes it unusually relevant.
Ahokas and colleagues ran a randomised crossover trial with 16 male basketball players, published in Biology of Sport in 2023 (PubMed). After a hard resistance session, players got either 20 minutes of infrared sauna or 20 minutes of passive rest. The sauna group showed a smaller drop in countermovement jump performance measured 14 hours later, less muscle soreness, and higher perceived recovery (all p < 0.01). Reassuringly, while heart rate variability was suppressed during the session itself, night-time measures showed no difference — the sauna didn't impair autonomic recovery.
Mero and colleagues found something more nuanced in SpringerPlus in 2015 (PubMed). After an endurance session, 30 minutes of far-infrared sauna improved jump performance versus no sauna. After a strength session, there was no difference at all. They also noted post-sauna heart rate was markedly lower after infrared (71 bpm) than after a traditional sauna (92 bpm) — infrared is a lighter cardiovascular load, which is precisely why it stacks well with training.
The honest summary: modest, real, and better supported for perceived recovery and soreness than for hard performance outcomes.
Chronic Pain: Small Studies, Encouraging Signals
Matsushita and colleagues treated 13 women with fibromyalgia using Waon therapy, reporting in Internal Medicine in 2008 that pain scores roughly halved after the first session and stayed low across the study (PubMed). Thirteen patients, no control group — a promising signal, not proof.
More interesting is a 2005 study in Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics by Masuda and colleagues, which added four weeks of infrared sauna to a multidisciplinary chronic-pain programme (PubMed). Both groups improved on pain scores. The difference emerged two years later: 77% of the sauna group had returned to work versus 50% of the control group (p < 0.05).
The only proper randomised trial here concerns headache. Kanji and colleagues randomised 37 people with chronic tension-type headache to eight weeks of regular sauna bathing or advice alone, publishing in the Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine in 2015 (PubMed). Headache intensity fell significantly (p = 0.002). Headache duration, sleep, and depression did not change.
Mood and Stress: Genuinely Mixed
Masuda and colleagues randomised 28 mildly depressed inpatients to four weeks of infrared sauna or no sauna, reporting in Psychosomatic Medicine in 2005 (PubMed). Somatic complaints, appetite, and relaxation scores all improved significantly. Mental complaints improved only marginally (p = 0.054) — which is to say, not significantly.
When Hussain and Cohen surveyed sauna users worldwide for the Global Sauna Survey, published in Complementary Therapies in Medicine in 2019, relaxation and stress relief were the reasons people gave most often for going (PubMed). That's meaningful — but it's self-report, and it can't separate the heat from the simple act of setting aside thirty quiet minutes.
And a genuine caution, from a study that gets quoted far less often than it should. Marciniak and colleagues studied 16 firefighters in Annals of Work Exposures and Health in 2022 (PubMed). With no prior exercise, a 15-minute infrared sauna session raised body temperature but left heart rate, heart rate variability, and blood pressure unchanged. But after maximal exercise, sauna exposure left heart rate and lactate elevated and heart rate variability suppressed — the authors concluded it "may interfere with restoration of body temperature and parasympathetic nervous system reactivation."
The practical read: a sauna on a normal day is a light physiological load. A sauna immediately after an all-out effort is an additional load stacked on a body already working hard. Leave a gap, and don't assume maximum heat after maximum effort is automatically restorative.
Sleep: Where the Evidence Runs Out
This is the claim we'd most like to support, and we can't.
There are no published clinical trials showing that infrared sauna use improves sleep. The closest evidence involves far-infrared-emitting fabric. Chen and colleagues ran a pilot randomised controlled trial of far-infrared-emitting pyjamas on 40 poor sleepers, published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health in 2023 (PubMed). Both groups improved — and there was no significant difference between the real pyjamas and the sham ones. The authors reported the effects on sleep quality "were not superior to those in the control group."
The Kanji headache trial above also measured sleep, and found no improvement there either.
There is a plausible mechanism — body temperature drops after heat exposure, and that drop is part of how the body initiates sleep. Plenty of people find an evening sauna helps them wind down, and a warm, screen-free half hour before bed is a reasonable habit on its own merits. But "plausible and pleasant" is not the same as "demonstrated," and you deserve to know which one you're buying.
What the Evidence Does Not Support
To be direct about the claims we won't make:
- Detoxification. There is no good evidence that sweating meaningfully removes toxins. Your liver and kidneys do that work. Cleveland Clinic's own functional medicine specialist describes this research as "still in its infancy" (Cleveland Clinic).
- Weight loss. The Reed study measured the actual figure: about 0.48% of body weight per session, and it's water. You will replace it with your next glass.
- Deep-tissue penetration beyond other forms of heat. Directly measured, and found to be superficial.
- Improved sleep. Not demonstrated in any infrared sauna trial to date.
- A substitute for exercise or medication. Nothing in this literature supports that, and several authors explicitly warn against it.
We'd add a note from Mayo Clinic's Dr. Brent Bauer, who has studied infrared saunas and makes a point we think about often: over-the-top claims do infrared saunas a disservice, because they lead the medical community to dismiss the whole category — even where modest, real benefits exist. Overselling this doesn't just mislead people. It buries the parts that are true.
How Good Is the Evidence Overall?
It's a fair question, and someone has answered it directly. Hussain and Cohen systematically reviewed the clinical effects of regular dry sauna bathing in Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine in 2018, covering 40 studies and 3,855 participants (PubMed).
Their verdict is worth quoting exactly: "Regular dry sauna bathing has potential health benefits." Not proven — potential. And the reason for that hedge is in their methods: of those 40 studies, only 13 were randomised controlled trials, and most had fewer than 40 participants.
That single sentence explains almost everything on this page. The sauna literature is broad, consistently positive in direction, and thin in quality. It is entirely reasonable to find it encouraging. It is not yet the kind of evidence that settles arguments.
Safety: The Part Most Articles Skip

Saunas are not risk-free, and the most useful paper here is refreshingly unglamorous. Kaiser and colleagues reviewed 17 years of sauna-related injuries at an Austrian trauma centre — 209 patients, 274 diagnoses — for a 2023 paper in Injury (PubMed).
The leading causes weren't exotic. Slips and falls accounted for 57.5% of injuries, and dizziness or fainting for 30.0%. Head and face injuries came overwhelmingly from fainting; hand, wrist and foot injuries from slipping. One patient sustained serious burns after losing consciousness in a sauna while severely intoxicated.
Which points to unusually simple precautions:
- Hydrate before and after. Dizziness and fainting are the mechanism behind most head injuries here. Harvard Health suggests two to four glasses of water after a session (Harvard Health).
- Stand up slowly. Your blood pressure is lower than usual when you finish.
- Never use a sauna while intoxicated. Alcohol featured in the worst case in the series.
- Mind your footing. Wet feet on wood and tile cause more injuries than heat does.
- Start short and cool. Cleveland Clinic suggests beginning around 110°F for 5–10 minutes, keeping sessions under 30 minutes, and limiting use to three or four times a week while you adapt.
One further point that rarely appears in sauna marketing: the Hussain and Cohen review identified a single adverse finding across all 40 studies — a small study reporting disrupted sperm production, which reversed once sauna use stopped. Cleveland Clinic accordingly advises those who are pregnant or actively trying to conceive to avoid infrared saunas. If you're planning a family, this is worth knowing before you buy, not after.
Talk to your doctor before starting if you are pregnant, have cardiovascular disease, arrhythmia, low or unstable blood pressure, kidney disease, multiple sclerosis or heat intolerance, or if you take blood-pressure medication — the 2026 safety review specifically flagged beta-blocker users and frail older adults as groups where the margins aren't well defined.
How to Use One, Based on the Studies
If you want to mirror the protocols that actually produced results in the literature, they're remarkably consistent:
- Temperature. The cardiac studies used 60°C. The recovery studies used 43–50°C. Hotter is not better; infrared works at moderate temperatures by design.
- Duration. 15 minutes in the Waon protocol; 20–30 minutes in the recovery trials.
- The rest period matters. Every Waon study includes 30 minutes of rest under a blanket afterwards. It is not an afterthought — it is part of the intervention, and it's the step home users almost always skip.
- Frequency. Five sessions a week for two to four weeks in the cardiac trials. Kominami's blood-pressure effects needed at least five sessions to appear.
- Consistency over intensity. Nothing in this literature rewards heroics. It rewards showing up.
The single clearest theme across every positive study — including the Finnish cohorts, where the benefits clustered among people bathing four to seven times a week for decades — is that the effects came from repeated sessions over time. Not from one transformative afternoon.
Choosing an Infrared Sauna

If the evidence above is the kind you find persuasive — modest, real, and dependent on consistency — then the most important feature of a sauna is that it fits your life well enough that you'll actually use it. Across our range:
- Rövia Luma 2-Person Infrared & Steam Sauna — infrared plus traditional steam in one cabin, for two.
- Rövia Ember 4-Person Infrared Sauna — a larger cabin with Himalayan salt panels.
- Rövia Aurora 3-Person Hybrid Sauna — infrared and steam, sized for three.
- Lumin One Far Infrared Sauna — a dedicated far-infrared cabin, the modality most of the research above studied.
- Lumin Two and Lumin Three — the same far-infrared design in larger footprints.
Browse the full infrared sauna collection to compare sizes and heat systems, or see every sauna we carry if you're weighing infrared against traditional — worth considering, given that the Finnish longevity research above studied traditional saunas rather than infrared. Our buying guides go deeper on sizing, power, and installation.
Many people pair heat with cold — if that interests you, our guide to contrast therapy covers how sauna and cold plunge work together.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are infrared sauna benefits scientifically proven?
Partly, and the honest answer depends on the benefit. The strongest evidence is in cardiovascular function — a 2018 meta-analysis in Clinical Cardiology found improvements in cardiac markers in heart failure patients, and a 2001 study in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology showed improved blood vessel function after two weeks of daily sessions. Evidence for exercise recovery is moderate. Evidence for sleep, detoxification, and weight loss is absent or negative. A 2018 systematic review of 40 sauna studies concluded there are "potential health benefits," noting that only 13 were randomised trials and most were small.
Do the Finnish studies about sauna and heart disease apply to infrared saunas?
Not directly, and this is the most common misuse of that research. The famous Finnish cohort studies — including the 2015 JAMA Internal Medicine paper linking frequent sauna use to lower cardiac mortality — studied traditional Finnish saunas, which are far hotter and work by a different mechanism. They're also observational, meaning they show an association rather than proving cause. They're strong evidence that heat exposure matters; they are not a claim about infrared cabins.
Do infrared saunas really penetrate 3–4 cm into the body?
Not meaningfully. A 2025 study in the Journal of Applied Physiology measured muscle temperature directly and found the thermal effect had dropped by 63% at 2.4 cm and was negligible beyond about 3.8 cm. The authors concluded commercial infrared saunas provide only superficial heating.
How often should I use an infrared sauna?
The clinical protocols that produced results used five sessions per week for two to four weeks, at 60°C for 15 minutes, followed by 30 minutes of rest. Cleveland Clinic suggests starting more gently — three to four times a week, under 30 minutes. Consistency over several weeks appears to matter far more than the length of any single session.
Can an infrared sauna lower blood pressure?
A single session reliably lowers blood pressure for a short period. Whether that lasts is unresolved — a 2026 review in Complementary Therapies in Medicine concluded that long-term antihypertensive efficacy is unproven. It is not a replacement for medication, and people on blood-pressure drugs should speak to their physician first.
Will an infrared sauna help me sleep better?
There's no clinical trial evidence that it will. The closest study, on far-infrared-emitting pyjamas, found no significant benefit over sham pyjamas. The mechanism is plausible and many people find an evening session relaxing, but it hasn't been demonstrated.
Is an infrared sauna safe?
For most healthy adults, yes, with sensible precautions. The largest injury study found slips, falls, and fainting — not heat itself — caused the overwhelming majority of sauna injuries. Hydrate, stand up slowly, never use one after drinking, and check with your doctor first if you're pregnant, trying to conceive, or have a cardiovascular, blood-pressure, kidney, or heat-intolerance condition.
References
- Laukkanen T, Khan H, Zaccardi F, Laukkanen JA. Association between sauna bathing and fatal cardiovascular and all-cause mortality events. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2015;175(4):542–548. PubMed
- Kunutsor SK, Khan H, Zaccardi F, Laukkanen T, Willeit P, Laukkanen JA. Sauna bathing reduces the risk of stroke in Finnish men and women: A prospective cohort study. Neurology. 2018;90(22):e1937–e1944. PubMed
- Zaccardi F, Laukkanen T, Willeit P, Kunutsor SK, Kauhanen J, Laukkanen JA. Sauna Bathing and Incident Hypertension: A Prospective Cohort Study. American Journal of Hypertension. 2017;30(11):1120–1125. PubMed
- Laukkanen T, Kunutsor S, Kauhanen J, Laukkanen JA. Sauna bathing is inversely associated with dementia and Alzheimer's disease in middle-aged Finnish men. Age and Ageing. 2017;46(2):245–249. PubMed
- Hussain J, Cohen M. Clinical Effects of Regular Dry Sauna Bathing: A Systematic Review. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2018;2018:1857413. PubMed
- Reed EL, Uzoekwe CC, Atencio JK, Minson CT, Halliwill JR. Muscle temperature increases during a single far infrared sauna session without changes in intestinal temperature. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2025;138(6):1628–1637. PubMed
- Källström M, Soveri I, Oldgren J, et al. Effects of sauna bath on heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Cardiology. 2018;41(11):1491–1501. PubMed
- Tei C, Imamura T, Kinugawa K, et al. Waon Therapy for Managing Chronic Heart Failure — Results From a Multicenter Prospective Randomized WAON-CHF Study. Circulation Journal. 2016;80(4):827–834. PubMed
- Imamura M, Biro S, Kihara T, et al. Repeated thermal therapy improves impaired vascular endothelial function in patients with coronary risk factors. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2001;38(4):1083–1088. PubMed
- Pizzey FK, Smith EC, Ruediger SL, et al. The effect of heat therapy on blood pressure and peripheral vascular function: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Experimental Physiology. 2021;106(6):1317–1334. PubMed
- Kominami K, Takahiza E, Tabuchi M, Akino M. Blood pressure-lowering effect of repeated Waon therapy in non-smokers with hypertension. Medicine. 2021;100(23):e26266. PubMed
- Yamasaki S, Tokunou T, Kashiwado Y, Makishi M, Horiuchi T. Acute blood pressure responses and safety considerations in heat therapy interventions: A narrative review. Complementary Therapies in Medicine. 2026;98:103341. PubMed
- Ahokas EK, Ihalainen JK, Hanstock HG, Savolainen E, Kyröläinen H. A post-exercise infrared sauna session improves recovery of neuromuscular performance and muscle soreness after resistance exercise training. Biology of Sport. 2023;40(3):681–689. PubMed
- Mero A, Tornberg J, Mäntykoski M, Puurtinen R. Effects of far-infrared sauna bathing on recovery from strength and endurance training sessions in men. SpringerPlus. 2015;4:321. PubMed
- Matsushita K, Masuda A, Tei C. Efficacy of Waon therapy for fibromyalgia. Internal Medicine. 2008;47(16):1473–1476. PubMed
- Masuda A, Koga Y, Hattanmaru M, Minagoe S, Tei C. The effects of repeated thermal therapy for patients with chronic pain. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics. 2005;74(5):288–294. PubMed
- Kanji G, Weatherall M, Peter R, Purdie G, Page R. Efficacy of regular sauna bathing for chronic tension-type headache: a randomized controlled study. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2015;21(2):103–109. PubMed
- Masuda A, Nakazato M, Kihara T, Minagoe S, Tei C. Repeated thermal therapy diminishes appetite loss and subjective complaints in mildly depressed patients. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2005;67(4):643–647. PubMed
- Hussain JN, Greaves RF, Cohen MM. A hot topic for health: Results of the Global Sauna Survey. Complementary Therapies in Medicine. 2019;44:223–234. PubMed
- Marciniak RA, Wahl CA, Ebersole KT. Autonomic Nervous System Response to Far-Infrared Sauna Exposure in Firefighters. Annals of Work Exposures and Health. 2022;66(3):356–367. PubMed
- Chen SC, Cheung TW, Yu BY, Chan MY, Yeung WF, Li L. Improving Sleep with Far-Infrared-Emitting Pajamas: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023;20(5):3870. PubMed
- Kaiser P, Seeher U, Krasniqi A, Keiler A, Crazzolara R, Meryk A. Injuries related to sauna bathing. Injury. 2023;54(7):110825. PubMed
- Vatansever F, Hamblin MR. Far infrared radiation (FIR): its biological effects and medical applications. Photonics & Lasers in Medicine. 2012;4:255–266. PubMed
- Beever R. Far-infrared saunas for treatment of cardiovascular risk factors: summary of published evidence. Canadian Family Physician. 2009;55(7):691–696. PubMed
- Harvard Health Publishing. Sauna use linked to longer life, fewer fatal heart problems. 2015. Harvard Health
- Harvard Health Publishing. Saunas and your health. Harvard Health
- Cleveland Clinic. Infrared sauna benefits and risks. Cleveland Clinic
- Mayo Clinic. Do infrared saunas have any health benefits? Mayo Clinic
This article is for general educational purposes and is not medical advice. It summarises published research, including its limitations, and should not be used to diagnose or treat any condition. Talk to your physician before beginning infrared sauna use, particularly if you are pregnant or trying to conceive, have a cardiovascular or kidney condition, take blood-pressure medication, or have any concerns.
Related reading: The Case for Infrared Saunas at Home · Contrast Therapy: Sauna Meets Cold Plunge · Shop Infrared Saunas